"Due to them being" ???

Holy crap they are shite —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.235.37 (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort William F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Admission of vandalism

edit

I see https://www.reddit.com/r/Scotland/comments/ig9jia/ive_discovered_that_almost_every_single_article/g2sq4vh/?context=3 so it's being done in bad faith WhisperToMe (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The narrow band of text at start of History section should be fixed

edit

That narrow piece of text at the beginning of the History section sandwiched between the picture of the home stadium and the information box looks very ordinary - can it be fixed? Fixing the quality of the team might prove a much harder task! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:9C32:F001:5409:AAA0:B611:3D3 (talk) 18:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've moved the image from the 'History' section, to further down the article into the 'Claggan Park' section.
I agree it looks more appropriate there but obviously if there's no consensus for this then revert.
Woodlandscaley (talk) Woodlandscaley (talk) 00:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply