Talk:Fortifications of Gibraltar

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Fortifications of Gibraltar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 18:19, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:19, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • No disambiguation links (no action required)
  • External links are in order (no action required)
  • There is a couple of duplicate links in the article which need be removed per WP:OVERLINK. Those are: RML 17.72 inch gun and Southport Gates.
  • All image licences are fine, except the "Gibraltar from the North Bastion coloured.jpg" need have US PD tag added. It is obviously too old to be copyrighted, but please just add the PD tag.
  • Referencing seems to be in order (no action requried)

MOS:

  • Units of measurement should be spelled out in this type of article per WP:UNIT (using abbr=off parameter in the {{convert}} templates.
  • Ellipses in the article are represented as three spaced dots, which is not recommended per MOS:ELLIPSIS. The MOS recommends non-spaced dots, but this is not a dealbreaker at this (GA) level.
  • Single digit numbers should be spelled out per WP:ORDINAL. In instance of ...only 3 m (9.8 ft) above sea level... where a {{convert}} template is normally used, it is possible to apply {{convert/spell }} template. When using the template, note that there is a space following "spell" and preceding the first parameter pipe.
  • Year ranges should be written according to MOS:YEAR. For instance instead of ...(written around 1370–1)..., there should be ...(written around 1370–71)...
  • In It mounted twelve 32-pounder guns and ten eight-inch howitzers... there should be a {{convert/spell }} template for the eight-inch (using adj=on parameter instead of abbr=off). There are further similar examples in the sections covering the 19th and the 20th centuries
  • "pounder" is sometimes abbreviated to "pdr" and sometimes spelled out. Since only four of the abbreviations are grouped relatively closely I'd recommend expanding the abbreviations to full words per WP:UNIT as well as MOS:ABBR. This would also achieve a consistent use of the pounder/pdr in the article.
  • According to MOS:HYPHEN, a hanging hyphen should be used in ...including iron-cast 6, 12 and 18-pdrs... as ...including iron-cast 6-, 12- and...

Prose:

  • Perhaps it would be prudent to add (later renamed the South Mole) after the first mention of the New Mole, especially since the term South Mole is not introduced elsewhere and the article on the mole indicates that is its common name now.

Great article! There are very few things to mend - most of them having to do with conversion of units and a number of other MOS-related issues which should be simple to fix. Outstanding work!--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Tomobe! I should be able to get through those later today. Prioryman (talk) 07:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sorry I took a bit longer than anticipated. It should all be done now. Prioryman (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Added a few tweaks - all good to go.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fortifications of Gibraltar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply