Talk:Fortified house

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Conflating fort with fortified house?

edit

A fort "refers to a small strongpoint usually occupied by military personnel." (Kaufmann & Kaufmann) This is fundamentally different from the purpose and occupancy of a historic fortified house. In addition the architecture and situation of the fortified houses being described here and US forts was totally different. Unless there is a consensus against, I therefore propose to remove the "United States" section on forts. Perhaps it needs its own article or to be merged into Station (frontier defensive structure) with a link in the "See also" section here. --Bermicourt (talk) 18:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fortified house. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply