Talk:Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Cleanup
edita cleanup tag was added to this page on 24 december 2005. edcolins accidentally posted the rationale in the edit log instead of the talk page. It looks like the clean-up ed requested was done on 31 december, as the shutdown of ffii.org section was removed then. Therefore I removed the clean-up tag today (Feb 17, 2006.) Anonymous Coward.
General advice
editI've done some clean-up on this article. Here are some explanations of my changes and motivations:
- Articles must be timeless. Sentences cannot start with "Recently", or "Last year", or "The most recent conference was on...". Remember that people might read this in 2009 or 2015, and the reader doesn't know if the article was written in 2009 or 2004, so times have to be absolute, not relative.
- Claims have to be referenced or at least reference-able. "FFII is the leading organisation" is fine for FFII's homepage, but isn't good for an encyclopedia article. "FFII is very active" and "FFII played an organisational role" are better because if someone wants a reference, then it's probably possible to find something to back these up. For a "leading organisation", the article could say that FFII was acknowledged as the leading organisation on such a date by organisations X, Y, and Z - and add references.
- This article is about FFII, not about software patents in general. Links should only be added if they explain what FFII is and does. If there's a great link about why software patents suck, that should be addded to software patents debate or some such article.
Hope that helps. --Gronky (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Whose is the petition
editIt's a EuroLinux Alliance petition. FFII seems to be one member of that group. Surely the most active member, but what's the accurate way to describe the petition so that this article and the EuroLinux article aren't contradicting each other. --Gronky (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for //petition.eurolinux.org/index_html?NO_COOKIE=true
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Failed, reference with dead link+bad archive link replaced by
{{citation needed}}
(bad URLs kept in an XML-comment). Be..anyone (talk) 05:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)