Talk:Fox
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fox article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Cornell University/Online Communities (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Why does diesel mechanic redirect here?
editI mean maybe some diesel mechanics have dogs, and those dogs are similar to foxes, but I think the redirect system is broken. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diesel_mechanic&redirect=no — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.7.135.66 (talk) 02:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
EDIT: It is fixed now — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnpaulÞ (talk • contribs) 17:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Cute
editEven though I haven't visited one, they look cute. - Anonymous guest 24.35.163.179 (talk) 00:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
The talk section is for helping to improve pages, not to express your thoughts on them. 88.107.231.157 (talk) 18:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC) FoxGalah
Sperm production
editDoes this section describe the timing worldwide or just the northern hemisphere? 116.251.32.210 (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Darwin’s fox conservation status
editOn this article it says that Darwin’s foxes are considered critically endangered, but on the IUCN Red List website it says that they are endangered https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/41586/107263066 should it be changed on here? Chickensarecool33 (talk) 01:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- It used to be critically endangered (in the 2004 and 2008 assessments), but was downgraded to endangered in 2016. I've updated the article. — Jts1882 | talk 11:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Attack mention relevance
edit> In 2018, a Clapham fox bit a woman on the arm after she had left the door to her flat open.
This one sentence seems irrelevant to the main article. One source being an interview of a woman who happened to be bitten doesn’t teach about the general behaviour of the species.
Since it’s only a single sentence without context, I suggest removing the whole Attack header altogether, unless it gets replaced by actual study material about the attack behaviour of foxes towards humans. Jasperiscool (talk) 12:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)