Talk:Frémont Emancipation/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 16:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Hi, I am reviewing this article and found it fascinating to read. I made some minor copy editing changes, which I hope you don't mind, to improve the flow and wording. Xtzou (Talk) 16:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: Clearly and concisely written

   B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MoS

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: Reliable sources

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: Sets the context

   B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Very nice article. Xtzou (Talk) 17:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Your review is very much appreciated. Best, Historical Perspective (talk) 19:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)