Talk:François-Timoléon de Choisy

File:Francois Timoleon de Choisy portrait.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Francois Timoleon de Choisy portrait.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on François-Timoléon de Choisy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927132529/http://www.gendercentre.org.au/resources/polare-archive/archived-articles/famous-trannies-in-early-modern-times.htm to http://www.gendercentre.org.au/resources/polare-archive/archived-articles/famous-trannies-in-early-modern-times.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Pronoun they/their

I suggest to reevaluate the usage of they/their. Setting aside there is not a clear consensus on using they/their pronouns even among native English speakers, English wiki is used by lots of non native speakers, whose English is on various level, who may not be aware of such novelty and to whom this may be very confusing. Encyclopedia should be as clear as possible and not a place for agendas. I'm a trans person and my English is pretty good, yet I was confused because I was not expecting it and I took they in its primary (plural) meaning. Had this been an article in a trans section or about a person from 21st century I would have realized right away, but I didn't expect this in an article about an abbot from 17th century. It is confusing and in my opinion pretentious. If you insist on it at least put some sort explanation into the article. Think about millions of high school kids all over the world who use wiki for studying and who would question their knowledge of basic English grammar rules. 77.240.103.204 (talk) 13:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Not Done. Pronouns are a difficult thing to nail in an encyclopedic fashion, particularly looking backwards to a period when alternative pronouns were not permissible in police society and records. It would be anachronistic to apply them in a fashion we lack evidence for. As such, they/them pronouns in this article will be removed until reliable sources suggest a non-anachronistic usage of such pronouns. ~ Pbritti (talk) 07:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)