Talk:François Mackandal

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

I propose that the article distinguish between Makandal's powerful reputation in Haitian national history and the far more limited knowledge historians have of the man and the movement associated with him. --Altaar (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Myth of the one-armed revolutionary, myths in general

edit

There are a lot of myths about Mackandal, and in the past few years there have been more and more English-language websites with a sincere interest in the history.

e.g., http://www.webster.edu/~corbetre/haiti/haiti.html e.g., http://www.macandal.org/

However, I believe that the story of Mackandal having only one arm falls into the class of folktakes or fables about the man.

While the man's story has tremendous historical importance, it is also peppered with myths and elements of the supernatural.

Those are worth including mention of in an Encyclopedia article, but they should be marked as folklore.

I honestly cannot recall reading any historical claim that Mackandal had only one arm, and I've seen many portraits (viz., semi-historical depictions) of the man, as both revolutionary and martyr, and I can't recall any of them showing him with one arm.

Of course, there's the possibility that I'm wrong, and this is either an historical fact or a very well-known fable (that none of the authors I read dealt with...) --but this is why citations are needed.

Hey, guess what: the portrait of him on that coin, shows his left arm (viz., the one the text of the article now suggests had been cut off). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.38.46 (talk) 09:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Poison?

edit

Echoing some of the previous concerns about separating fact from legend, the only evidence that exists to suggest that Macandal ever poisoned anyone is that white slave owners killed him because they believed he did. He never confessed to poisoning, even under torture, although he did confess to other crimes. If he did distribute poisons, there is a good chance that they were meant to be protective or curative charms, not meant to kill. And there are alternatives to explaining most poisoning deaths (even those alleged today). For instance: E. Coli was not discovered until 1885. Or: manioc leaf contains cyanide which can poison a person if not cooked correctly. Etc, etc. Accusations of poisoning come up in many slave societies, almost always slave owners accusing slaves. Almost always there is no more evidence than the accusation. In this case of white planters accusing an African maroon, there is no real evidence that poisoning ever happened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.159.20 (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on François Mackandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on François Mackandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply