This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the François Tamisier article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This may be a completely different concept, but I find this term confusing, because the "progressive rifling" (aka "gain twist") that I'm familiar with has nothing to do with the depth of the rifling. Rather it is a progression in the rate of spin, starting at a mild rate and increasing as the bullet moves down the bore, as a way to more gently impart spin to the projectile. I'm just worried that whoever wrote that passage was, in fact, talking about your typical "progressive rifling", and was simply confused as to how it works, and thus gave an inaccurate description on this page. If there ARE two totally different methods, it ought to mention the fact, to ensure that people don't get the two concepts mixed up, or credit the wrong person with coming up with the idea..45Colt03:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
