 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 3, 2013, June 3, 2014, June 3, 2017, June 3, 2018, and June 3, 2020. |
Hagiography?
editThe term "hagiographic" has been used in reference to this article. It appears to be uncritical or "reverential" to the subject. Any clean-up to improve this aspect of the article would be welcome.--Stormbay (talk) 01:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
'and therefore, he is now a saint.'
editThe act of canonization of any form does not make the person a saint, but it recognizes him or her as such. Therefore I would change the line to 'and therefore, he is now numbered among the saints' or something like that. I won't unilaterally make the change, if the person who wrote it disagrees. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The Séminaire de Québec
editIn the section " The Séminaire de Québec" it's written : " In 1638 he appointed the previously troublesome de Queylus as the first Superior of a new seminary in Ville-Marie."
the year 1638 does not make sense cause François de Laval was 15 years old then. Chiloa (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be 1668 based on related content in Gabriel Thubières de Levy de Queylus.- MrX 17:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Double infobox
editDoes this article really call for the two separate infoboxes? They seem fairly redundant, but maybe I'm missing something.— Moriwen (talk) 17:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)