Talk:Francis Crick

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Leschnei in topic Personal communication as source
Former good article nomineeFrancis Crick was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
September 30, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Francis Harry Compton Crick

edit

@Unknown Voice Actor: Please provide a citation for the changes you just made to the Francis Crick page changing his full name from Francis Harry Compton Crick to Francis Harold Compton Crick. I can find no such reference myself. Indeed, everything that I have found, including the very first reference on the page which is for his name in the lede, says that his name is Francis Harry Compton Crick. The only variation I have found is Francis H. C. Crick which is no help. At this point, it looks to me like your changes amount to WP:OR which should be reverted on the basis of WP:NOR. In the spirit of WP:AGF I am asking you for a citation rather than just reverting the changes out of hand. Shortsword (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Having not received any kind of answer from @Unknown Voice Actor: for the question posed above, I have reverted the edits Unknown Voice Actor made changing Francies Harry Compton Crick's full name. Shortsword (talk) 03:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on Francis Crick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Personal communication as source

edit

I removed the reference below from the '1951–1953: DNA structure' section. Personal communications can't be used as sources since they aren't reliable and can't be confirmed independently.

<ref>Personal communication: Conversation between Francis Crick and Kim Booth, August 1980</ref>

Leschnei (talk) 18:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply