This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
@User:Randy Kryn: Francis Dana is considered a Founding Father by whom? Since you didn't add a citation, we have no way of telling. So please apply one so we can discuss what your source is and then what other sources have to say. Allreet (talk) 09:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Removed "Founding Fathers" title as unsourced. Articles of Confederation not recognized as a "founding document" by either National Archives or U.S. Congress. Also removed Dispute template. Allreet (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
@User:Randy Kryn: I have provided sourced text qualifying Dana's alleged status as a founding father, presumably for having signed the Articles of Confederation. Perhaps he is, but we have no way of knowing who shares this view. Meanwhile, the sources I referenced do not consider the Articles a founding document. My belief, based on sources, is that this is a minority view. Perhaps someday the Articles will be more widely accepted in this regard. Meanwhile, it is my understanding that Wikipedia follows such trends; it does not lead them. Allreet (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Why does it follow that one has to sign one of the founding documents to be a "founding father." He was a leader of the US at its inception. His seat in the Continental Congress and signing of the Articles of Confederation confirms as much. How is he not a founding father? Jasonant (talk) 05:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
