This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
"Of the 135 members nominated, only 68 attended; they included Lascelles but he was absent when sentence was passed and did he sign the death warrant. Charles was executed on 30 January 1649 and . . ."
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What is the source for the statement "While unconnected to the aristocratic family of the same name (etc)"? If it's the biography at http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1660-1690/member/lascelles-francis-1612-67, the actual statement there is "Lascelles is a name of great antiquity in Yorkshire, and the senior branch already held estates in the North Riding in the 12th century. But Lascelles’s grandfather, who bought the Stank estate in 1608, was not able to connect up his pedigree with the medieval family." "The medieval family" is by no means to necessarily be conflated with "the aristocratic family" (i.e., the Earls of Harewood; that peerage- and the Lascelles viscountcy- was only created in 1812 for Edward Harewood [1740-1820] who had been created Baron Harewood in 1796, and who was the heir of his unmarried cousin, Edwin Lascelles, 1st Baron Harewood (that title, created 1790, becoming extinct). At any rate, tracing back from Edwin Lascelles on Wikipedia brings one back- through his father Henry and grandfather Daniel (although interestingly this article doesn't link to Daniel's for some reason)- to this article. Burke's Peerage 2003 (vol. 2, p. 1784) corroborates this relationship - as do older peerages such as Collins's- https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JFc5AAAAMAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&printsec=frontcover&dq=Francis+Lascelles+1612&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=lascelles&f=false (see p. 510-12 for the descent from Francis to Edwin, 1st Baron Harewood) Even the Collins pedigree, after noting that "the family of Lascelles are of ancient standing and respectability in Yorkshire", observes that "there was a baronial family of this name, and seated in this county. Roger de Lascelles received summons among the Peers, 22 Edw. I", this older family, to which the Harewood Lascelles family were evidently unable to establish a link, presumably being that referred to on the historyofparliament site.