Talk:Frank Buglioni

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

POV edits by GiordanoBishop

edit

GiordanoBishop keeps reinserting a particular point of view into the article. They have even come to my talk page and told me to leave the article alone because it belonged to them and Frank Buglioni. I tried explaining why the edit was not appropriate but their response was to yell that the article does belong to them and they will continue to revert to their preferred revision with the POV in it. Anyone else want to try to explain why the edits do not belong. GB fan 18:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

lol youre so unaware, do you spend your life on here? GiordanoBishop (talk) 18:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually you are the one unaware of the rules. No I do not spend my life on here, just on here now like you are. GB fan 18:38, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

so why the need to create a whole talk page and everything ha get a life --GiordanoBishop (talk) 19:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Because that is how wikipedia works, if there is a disagreement about content youraise it on the talk page so there is a discussion about it. I started a discussion now it is your turn or anyone elses turn to explain what they think of the edits, whether they belong or not and why. GB fan 19:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Following on what was on GB Fans talk page I would like to remind editors we need to be civil to each other and will reiterate the point that GB Fan said and that is that editors do not own articles regardless of the number of edits to the page. GordanBishop please also note that articles MUST maintain a Neutral Point of View (it is policy) and conform to Biographies of living persons. -- MisterShiney 19:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

POV Cleanup

edit

I have started cleaning up the article and trying to remove some of the POV in the article. The article is full of POV language. It is written like a personal website not an encyclopedia article. GB fan 22:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quote from Buglioni

edit

I removed a quote from Buglioni, that I put a citation needed tag on a couple of days ago. The original author of the article said that no citation is possible. It was reverted by the author with no explanation. The author has stated they will revert to their preferred version. GB fan 13:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Professional Career Section

edit

Hi guys

i just need help on the professional career section, where i can i get citations of him winning a fight, i can only think of BoxRec which has all his results but i cant use the same reference for each paragraph?

Thanks --GiordanoBishop (talk) 17:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't have suggestions myself, but I have posted at WikiProject Boxing to see if anyone from there can help. – Wdchk (talk) 22:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Frank Buglioni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply