Talk:Frank Sinatra Sings for Only the Lonely

Untitled

Isn't the album's title either Frank Sinatra Sings For Only The Lonely or just Only The Lonely? I don't understand the current article title. Wasted Time R 16:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

I have seen the album listed as both and I believe the title of this article was listed more often in sources. However, people searching for the album might search for simply "Only The Lonely" looking for the album, hence including the alternate title. Perhaps we should create disambiguation page for Only The Lonely? Williamnilly 17:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Why would it be listed as Sinatra Sings ... when the album cover clearly shows it's Frank Sinatra Sings ...? Wasted Time R 18:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Good question. The page shall be moved! Williamnilly 19:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

I own this album (on CD) and on the spine the billing reads: "FRANK SINATRA SINATRA SINGS FOR ONLY THE LONELY". The actual CD has the title reading Sings For Only The Lonely right beneath Frank Sinatra's name but personally I usually go with the spine as the definitive billing (as cover art is often stylized). I can produce scans if anyone's interested. Lairor 19:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I think both titles are acceptable (and are noted in the article). Williamnilly 06:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and someone should re-word the "Originally, Frank Sinatra had planned..." paragraph as it's been lifted directly from the allmusic.com review of the album. I'll probably get around to doing it eventually if noone else does.--Lairor 19:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Done Williamnilly 06:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

"

i recently did all this with the ella songbooks. took me ages!Gareth E Kegg 01:36, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frank Sinatra Sings for Only the Lonely/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I am reviewing your article for GA. Below is my evaluation. Please feel free to contact me with questions or comments. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): The article lacks lead section and does not follow MoS layout.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): The material under Grammy Awards is not referenced. b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Gives a general overview b (focused): Does not provide sufficient detail on the development and production; lacks important sections such as one critical reviews as suggested by Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums. Please see It's About Time (Christina Milian album) for an example of a GA album article.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article is good as far as it goes. It needs to be fully developed with detailed information. Please see example given above as well as To the Stars (album) for ideas as to what qualities an article on an album for GA status. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

requested revision/cleanup

did some minor cleanup and revision as per Wiki's request, improved some phrasing, gave extensive recording info it's own section ("Background") so as to eliminate the overlong, run-on feel of opening section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.142.97 (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

ClueBot screw-up

just wanted to point out that after my lengthy and badly-needed revision of this article, something called 'ClueBot' came along and reverted the article back to its poorly-written, disorganized former self. hoping that this is brought to someone's attention who can prevent it from happening again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.142.97 (talk) 12:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Frank Sinatra Sings for Only the Lonely/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start class: Y A reasonably complete infobox Y A lead section giving an overview of the album Y A track listing Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient) Y Categorisation at least by artist and year C class: Y All the start class criteria Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section) Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. B class: Y All the C class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians Y No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS Needs to be cleaned up as it's nearly one big intro paragraph. Technical staff should also be listed in the album section. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 19:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 15:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Sinatra Sings for Only the Lonely. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120910105743/http://www.redroom.com/audio/frank-sinatra-lush-life to http://www.redroom.com/audio/frank-sinatra-lush-life

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)