Talk:Franz Koenigs

Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish WP:BIO

In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Untitled

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, perhaps User:Robvhoorn (talk · contribs), or other recent contributors to this article, will make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — triwbe (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Category:Flagged articles

I have removed the [[Category:Flagged articles]] from the message above . it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, but the current version looks OK to me. ^Avicenna_sis @ 04:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

insane action

The art collection of Franz Koenigs is for many decades a major issue in Dutch policy. So, if you want to verify, go to the Kremlin, Dutch parliament, Duttch prime minister, the president 0of the Ukraine or verify Dutch newspapers over many decades. Another possiblity is go to the Dutch Wikipedia and look at the lemma "Koenigscollectie", which unfortunatelu not has been adapted to the latest developments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robvhoorn (talk • contribs) 16:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

source

I am unfortunately not sure that the family history presented at a conference counts as a RS. It remains a personal account , not subject to editorial control. Still thinking.... DGG (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Franz Koenigs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041226091042/http://www.ejil.org:80/journal/Vol7/No1/art4-02.html to http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol7/No1/art4-02.html#TopOfPage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)