Talk:Fraser's Hill
Fraser's Hill has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 29, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fraser's Hill article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
A fact from Fraser's Hill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sprucing up the article
editI noticed that there is very little information on the recreational activities available at Fraser's. I've created a bare bones summary, but perhaps those who have had more information about any activities there can contribute? --K-Rio 11:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
I've also noticed that the intro page, particularly the history of Fraser's Hill does not cite any references. --K-Rio (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've done an almost complete rewrite today, adding most of the citations. I've blanked the assessments (formerly Start-class), inviting others to re-assess the article. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Fraser's Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720233548/http://www.wwf.org.my/about_wwf/what_we_do/education_main/education_conservation_education_programme/conservation_community_conservation_education/community_frasers_hill/ to http://www.wwf.org.my/about_wwf/what_we_do/education_main/education_conservation_education_programme/conservation_community_conservation_education/community_frasers_hill/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090627072146/http://www.pahangtourism.com.my/highlands/attractions/fraser_hill.html to http://www.pahangtourism.com.my/highlands/attractions/fraser_hill.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703095748/http://www.pkbf.org.my/history.htm to http://www.pkbf.org.my/history.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090818202503/http://www.pkbf.org.my/trails.htm to http://www.pkbf.org.my/trails.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100617064430/http://www.pkbf.org.my/events.htm to http://www.pkbf.org.my/events.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- ... that Fraser's Hill in Malaysia was previously a tin mining area which was converted into a hill station after the tin ore depleted in 1913? Source: - https://web.archive.org/web/20200713043649/https://d1kjvfsq8j7onh.cloudfront.net/downloads/fraser_s_hill_guidebook_2013.pdf
- https://www.thestar.com.my/travel/2007/05/19/flee-to-the-hills
Improved to Good Article status by WPSamson (talk). Self-nominated at 03:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC).
- Comment Hook tweaked for grammar & repetition. Nice place btw, I enjoyed my brief stay! You might add "in Malaysia" to the hook. Johnbod (talk) 17:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the edit and the comment. WPSamson (talk) 03:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Proceeding to review: GA, hook checks out. Is a qpq needed? Otherwise ok. Johnbod (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: Not at the moment since I only got one credit for my previously promoted first DYK for the article Kabul City Center. WPSamson (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- GTG - ok. Also, earwig finds nothing. Johnbod (talk) 01:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This page did not pass GA Review. The Review was a one line review done by an abuse sock account. The account was blocked, the review was blanked. So it has not risen to GA Status at this point in time, and until I complete the review, the DYK? nomination ought be put on hold. Thank you. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, let me know. Thanks Johnbod (talk) 05:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Noting that this article has been passed. All's well that ends well. CMD (talk) 09:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fraser's Hill/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 05:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article.
- Previous GA Review by abuse sock account deleted. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Lead
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Yes, tells the tale of Construction began in October 1919 to convert the mine area into a resort. The site was renamed Fraser's Hil'
History
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Yes, it explains the processes taken up to make the Fraser's Hill area a holiday resort.
Geography
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Well written: Fraser's Hill's virgin forest coverage is around 92% of the overall land area, with only 1.5% of the area used for a town.
Climate
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Fraser's Hill's climate is classified as tropical. Climate data is laid out in a chart. Resourced from Climate Data.org
Biodiversity
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Due the land area being 92% forest, a range of invertebrates and animals, including those endangered, are given.
- A very attractive photo panel is given.
Environmental issues
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Effects of deforestation are given along with the environmental impact of new Federal Route 148.
- This has led to illegal collection and poaching of wild species to Fraser’s Hill.
Demographics
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- There is a digital divide resulting from the lack of adoption of technology, along with a lack of High School, etc.
Architecture
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- A pictorial view of housing at Fraser's Hill is given.
- A development is traced from colonial-era bungalows originally built as residences during the colonial era to adaptation and transformation of buildings.
Economy
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Reliant on tourism, approximately half of those employed here work in the hospitality industry.
- The commercial sector in Fraser’s Hill is mainly made up of hotels, restaurants, souvenir and retail stores.
Transport
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- A history of the roads and bus service is given, along with the closure of the only petrol station.
- The residents of Fraser's Hill hope that the government will reintroduce bus services in this area in the nearest future.
Telecommunications
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Newspapers are unavailable. Residents have to rely on television, the Internet, or read online newspapers to learn the latest news from around the world.
Education
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Fraser's Hill has two primary schools.
- Former Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew attended the school to learn Chinese while on vacation in Fraser's Hill.
Culture
editBirdwatching
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Birdwatchers from Asia and Europe often visit Fraser's Hill to photograph and study the region's birds.
Sports
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Fraser's Hill has become a popular place for hikers to hike on the well maintained trails in Fraser's Hill.
Film
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Two films are noted.
Notes
edit- Noted.
References
edit- Examined, OK
Further reading
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Noted
External Links
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- OK
End Matter
editIs it is Broad in its coverage?
edit- Yes, the article takes in many aspects of the origin, development and the community and its tourism.
More End Matter Stuff:
edit- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy?
- Yes
Is it stable?
edit- This article started life in January, 2005.
- It has had 386 edits, the latest edit being 29 January 2021.
- Page views in the past 30 days = 3,974 views.
- Page has been edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- A stable page with no evidence of edit-warring
Top editors are
edit* WPSamson * Dhamo95 * Twofingered Typist * Fayenatic london
- Very appropriately illustrated
- Illustrations are well laid out
- Multiple image panels are well utilised.
Overall
edit- A well designed and informative page.
Conclusion
edit- Passed --Whiteguru (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2022 (UTC)