A fact from Fraser Barron appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article is mostly based on a self-published biography that is only held by five libraries and shows signs of purple prose, eg "He was one of those young airmen who never showed fear and didn't know when to call it quits." The author seems to be an amateur historian whose work is almost exclusively self published. How can this be considered a reliable source? buidhe03:52, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Buidhe, according to that World Cat link, as I interpret it, the book is actually held by 37 institutions including libraries in Australia, one in Germany as well as the LOC. I'm not sure where the five came from. Regardless, although he has self-published some works (I suspect some of his early works on the Boer War and New Zealand Wars were published at a time when the topics may not have commercially viable for larger publishers in New Zealand), Stowers has also had books published by well known and reputable publishers - the best known of these is probably [Bloody Gallipoli, which was published by David Bateman Limited, a reputable publisher in New Zealand, and has been the subject of several news articles, such as this. His books have been cited by well known historians, for example reviewing some books in my own collection, Glyn Harper cites Bloody Gallipoli in Johnny Enzed. Another Stowers title Heroes of Gallipoli is cited in For King and Other Countries published just last year. Christopher Pugsley, like Harper a well known military historian, cites one Stower's self-published titles in relation to the Boer War in his book Kiwis in Conflict. Cliff Simons refers to another of Stower's self-published titles in Soldiers, Scouts and Spies, recently published by Massey University Press. There will be other examples of Stower's work being referred to by noted historians. He has even written an article for the New Zealand Government's commemorative website for the centenary of the First World War. All in all, he should be considered a reliable source despite some of his work being self-published. Zawed (talk) 09:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply