Talk:Freakum Dress/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{(T • C • I love Wikipedia!)} 08:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

This article is well-written, well-sourced, neutral and factually accurate. I'm happy to pass this article, but I need to go through it first.

• Info in the last sentence of first paragraph is not mentioned elsewhere. Source?  Done Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

• Link Makeba Riddick.  Done Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

• There are no photos of Knowles, Rich Harrison or Makeba Riddick, doing activities related to the song for the infobox. Please find one, but of there aren't any, nvever mind.

The best i could do was to add a picture of Knowles in 2007. Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

• Add Music portal.

I added

Category:Rhythm and blues songs Category:Hip hop songs Category:Dance-pop songs Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

• No, its {{Portal|Music}} at the end of "Credits and personnel". Also, put : before "Category" so I can see you meant Sp33dyphil ^{(T • C • I love Wikipedia!)} 05:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Is it fine now? Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

• Add an alt text for photo. WP:ALT

I added one but i am not sure. Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

• Ref 34, how's Nuts (magazine) a reliable source? WP:RS

I thought it was reliable. So many GA articles use it. Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Assessment

1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and

(c) it contains no original research.

3. Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Apart from those points above, there are not many aspects to criticise in the article. Very well-done

Thank you. Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)