Talk:Freccia IFV
Latest comment: 1 year ago by FelipeFritschF in topic Split "Centauro II" in its own article?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Split "Centauro II" in its own article?
editSeeing the back and forth going on in this article - wouldn't it be appropriate the transfer all the info about the Centauro II into its own article? Like at the Italian wikipedia: Centauro, Freccia, Centauro II. noclador (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I hadn't noticed the Centauro II was a subsection here, so I apologize for that. Nonetheless, I don't see why that section is in this article and not the Centauro one in the first place. Even if it's a common platform, the Centauro and Freccia have different purposes. It'd be like putting all vehicles based off the T-72 incorporated in the T-90 article (itself a development of the T-72). Similarly, the A2, A3, A4 etc versions of the Leopard 1 are included in the same article, whereas the Leopard 2 is a separate one. IMO the Centauro II should just be a subsection in the Centauro article. Strictly speaking we could have a separate article but it could be argued it's unnecessary. FelipeFritschF (talk) 09:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)