Talk:Fred Dibnah/GA1
GA review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Initial comments
editThis looks like a GA-level article, I'm not sure that I'm going to accept the Info box with "Years active 1979–2004"; and I was going to make comments about the WP:Lead but you changed it whilst I was looking elsewhere (I have two Firefox Wikipedia Tabs open). I will now start reviewing the article in more depth section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't expect it to be reviewed so quickly but obviously we have a Lancastrian in our midst :) I've just tidied up the Filmography section, and the statue part. I have a better photograph of his house and back yard to add, which I took just today. I also have a [when?] to resolve, that shouldn't take long. Parrot of Doom 16:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
I have reviewed this nomination in some depth and have made a couple of "minor" copyedits - I've moved the MBE out of "filming" and the two honourary PhDs out of "Legacy" into a new subsection called "Honours" - I hope this has not distorted the flow. I think its an improvement, but this is not an mandatory requirement for GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Overall summary
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting, well-illustrated and well-referenced article on a British "Character".
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article. Yes: I "Did like that". This article is now a GA. Pyrotec (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)