Talk:Fred Rouhling
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 78.18.236.67 in topic Akira 9b claim refutation by repetition and downgrading to 9a
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Fred Rouhling be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editPlease, no climber-dude jargon. What is the meaning of the word "destroyed" in this article? Surely the boulder has not been destroyed! Cartbeforethehorse (talk) 01:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Cartbeforethehorse
- Apparently it can: https://www.8a.nu/articles/vandalism-of-french-boulders-encore
- They suggest somebody used a hammer to destroy holds. --217.229.80.19 (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Akira 9b claim refutation by repetition and downgrading to 9a
editThe following sentence wrongly implies the grade 9b has been confirmed:
"Although the controversy about his route Akira seems to have settled down with Climbing magazine and the popular website 8a.nu supporting his claim in the recent past, ..."
Where does this come from? The only citation in this article actually shows the route has been repeated twice and his claim not been confirmed. Instead it was graded 9a. --46.91.59.169 (talk) 16:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed this, and updated this article. 78.18.236.67 (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)