Talk:Freddie de Guingand
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freddie de Guingand article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Freddie de Guingand has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 27, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Major-General Freddie de Guingand was invested with his knighthood in the field by King George VI? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Serious Pov issues
editThere is some serious POV-pushing in this article, mostly concerning the qualities of the subject. I have removed some, but a few issues remain outstanding, be it that he was "blessed with considerable diplomatic skills..." or hugely successful in business. Perhaps as a result of the POV agenda, there's also considerable WP:OR involved (cites to the London Gazette in particular).—Brigade Piron (talk) 10:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Freddie de Guingand/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 23:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- "In 1926 de Guingand volunteered for service on secondment with the King's African Rifles." - Is there a link for secondment?
- Yes, secondment, per WP:WHAAOE. Linked. (At the Hood it was called it TDY - you may be more familiar with that term.) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- "he was appointed as Eighth Army's Brigadier General Staff (Operations) vice Brigadier Jock Whiteley." - I'm finding this phrase confusing. It may just be comprehension issues on my part, though.
- See Staff_(military)#British_and_Commonwealth_staff. The British staff was divided into G and A&Q branches. The BGS was the head of the G branch. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- "his wife Arlie was understandably unimpressed with austere post-war Britain" - I'm concerned that "understandably" may be editorializing here, may be best to leave the word out.
- Deleted. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Sourcing and image licensing looks fine.
Not much to nitpick on here; good work. Hog Farm Talk 01:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 07:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- ... that Major-General Freddie de Guingand was invested with his knighthood in the field by King George VI (pictured)? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Improved to Good Article status by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC).
- Hi Hawkeye7, what an excellent article! Promoted GA on 16 May; well written, cited inline throughout; I don't have access to the offline sources but I did a spotcheck on some of those available to me and found no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook is interesting enough for me and supported by a great photo (though some may consider it not suitable at small scale, I like it); source used in article for hook is offline but the IWM photo listing here confirms the fact; image is appropriately and freely licensed; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 09:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)