Talk:Free Nations League

RE: I have my doubts that the article was not written in a biased way

Hi, thank you for starting the article about the organization. I want to make some corrections to the article. I have my doubts that the article was not written in a biased way.

1. Why were the national movements of peoples labeled as separatist? There is a better term for them national liberation movements. Moreover, this is what the Free Nations League calls these movements, and the movements themselves position themselves as such. 2. Why the article says that the organization mostly represents Finno-Ugric peoples. This does not correspond to the information provided in the article itself in the list of peoples. 3. Why does it say “The group argues that the various minority communities of Russia are ‘captive nations’ if the link provided does not say anything like that? Why are the national republics and other parts of the federation called “minority communities”? This is how you can call Turks in Germany or the Irish in the USA, but not the peoples in Russia, who have political entities in the form of states. National republics are states according to the constitution of the Russian Federation itself. 4. What does “minority regions” mean if we are talking about national republics, which are states. Regions are a geographical concept, not a political one. This leads me to the conclusion that the article is written against wikipedia rules in a biased way. FreeKalmykia (talk) 14:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)