Talk:Free Presbyterian Church of North America

	North America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Reformed Christianity

	Reformed Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Origin

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is a lot to be explained about how the FPCNA began, not just as a denomination, but with the assimilation of the original NA congregations into the Ulster denomination. Right now the Origin section just reiterates what I've put in the first paragraph, more or less. The Origin section still deserves to exist though, and needs to include the founding of the Toronto, Greenville, and Pennsylvania congregations in the future. I can supply that soon enough if nobody else does. Dtjohnso (talk) 15:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me.--John Foxe (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Is it fair to label Free Presbyterians as Protestant?

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Yes, I get the fact that early Presbyterians were part of a collective gathering of religions identified as Protestant. But why can we simply not refer to this section of the Free Presbyterian Church (formed after the Protestant Reformation) as 'Christian?' Is it not more respectful to identify a religious group by what they believe in than what they oppose? On another tangent, could this include a little more information on the connection of the Church to the larger Presbyterian Church (is that how it is referred?). At first read I assumed they were a breakoff group from the larger Presbyterian body. Following the link I discovered they were a breakoff from one of the larger Presbyterian groups confirming my suspicion. Then on even further study it seemed they are still a body in full fellowship with the larger Presbyterian church. Now it seems they are in fellowship with the "Associated Presbyterian" movement but it is confusing as to whether that is in good standing with the general Presbyterian church. Could someone lay this one out so a normal guy like me can understand the context?--Canadiandy talk 03:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Having read a little further I recognize the Church itself is "unashamedly" Protestant so I see the logic for that label. I also recognize two other key qualifiers (see article link http://www.freepres.org/sep_details.asp?sep_how). At th Groups website they further identify themselves as both Presbyterian and Evangelistic. I would suggest we consider adding three terms (which I believe are all linkable) so that the article textbox identifies the Church as; Christian, Protestant, Presbyterian, Evangelistic.--Canadiandy talk 01:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've been bold and made the change (re: infobox = Christian)--Canadiandy talk 01:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic