Talk:Free the nipple/Archive 1

Archive 1

Class Feedback

Awesome article, I wasn't aware about the early laws regarding toplessness. Not sure if this is possible, but if so, it might be cool to look into how the campaign has made strides - has instagram changed their policies at all? It's a little ridiculous that female nipples aren't allowed when you consider the other things people are allowed to post. -Shannclark (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Suggestions

Looking good, some thoughts:

• can you mention the names of the men?
• "The men, who wandered about the hot beaches of Coney Island completely topless, were subsequently arrested."
  • "These men" (or there names)?
  • Can you confirm it was hot on the day of their arrest?

-Reagle (talk) 13:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Free the Nipple (campaign). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150306065619/http://gawker.com:80/miley-cyrus-frees-her-nipples-in-topless-instagram-phot-1675985556 to http://gawker.com/miley-cyrus-frees-her-nipples-in-topless-instagram-phot-1675985556

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 25 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Free the nipple. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist | freedom isn't free 11:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

---

Free the Nipple (campaign) → Free the Nipple – This seems like a WP:ONEOTHER situation because primary already redirects here since Dec 2015. The other article Free the Nipple (film) is both named for this campaign and also has consistently fewer page views. I considered requesting this as an uncontroversial move, but since the film article created at primary first, a clearer consensus might be best. -- Netoholic @ 03:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. buidhe 04:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

• Support per nom and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Simple reversal of a redirect. Station1 (talk) 07:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support per nom. An emperor /// Ave 15:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support per nom ~ HAL333 04:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
• Move to free the nipple. Support un-disambiguating per nom (i.e. WP:ONEOTHER) and per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. However, per MOS:CAPS (especially MOS:DOCTCAPS) and WP:NCCAPS, this should be in lower case like other social movements, memes, and other pop-culture phenomena, unless it can be demonstrated that this phrase is near-universally capitalized in independent reliable sources. It takes only a moment of news searching to show that it is not. If "free the nipple" is good enough for Los Angeles Times [1], Us magazine [2], New York Post [3][4], NPR [5], Vox [6], OK! [7] [arguably an NSFW link], American Bar Association Journal [8], and many other mainstream sources (from academic to low-brow), then it's good enough for Wikipedia.

  Looking more closely, one finds the phrase capitalized most often in the following cases: A) The particular context of legal cases (which have title-case titles, e.g. Free the Nipple v. Fort Collins); we see this even in sources like NY Post [9], who use "free the nipple" in general, but "Free the Nipple" in reference to the legal parties (same at The Collegian [10] and various other sites); and, B) news reports that mistakenly describe the diffuse social movement as an organization or group ([11],[12],[13], etc.) and are thus assuming it is a proper name like American Civil Liberties Union or National Rifle Association, when of course it is not. In the Ft. Collins case, the full title of the legal case is Free the Nipple–Fort Collins v. City of Fort Collins, and it refers to an actual Free the Nipple–Fort Collins organization, which (in complete form) is a proper name; there would not be standing to file a case under such a name otherwise, and notably, some of the other cases do not have names like this, but individually named plaintiffs, as in Lilley v. New Hampshire (the case most in the news, having gone to but declined by the US Supreme Court), because there are no actual incorporated local organizations behind those other cases. Worse, numerous capitalizing sources over-capitalize even further, and write "Free The Nipple" with a capital-T stuck onto the ([14],[15],[16],[17] etc.) indicating that they simply have typographic practices incompatible with encyclopedic writing, and which are thus sources that have no bearing on the question for us.

  What is happening here is that in one specific legal case, a proper name of an organization (Free the Nipple–Ft. Collins) is involved, and the capitalization from that is being spread around to every instance of the shorter phrase in some sources, while other sources just have a habit of over-capitalizing in general, and the rest of them sensibly do not capitalize it. Where there's this much capitalization inconsistency, MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS tell us to use lower case. Notably, while activists of all sorts have a strong tendency to capitalize the name of their cause, one of the largest Facebook groups devoted to this one doesn't do so consistently even in its own front-matter [18]: 'This page has been created as a centralized place for the Free the Nipple movement. ... While this is "free the nipple" group ...'. As a broad social movement (and our article is about that, not about an organization in Ft. Collins), this one isn't actually different from environmental movement or veganism or women's liberation (especially), or whatever. It belongs in lower case. This might necessitate some sentence rejiggering in a few cases for clarity in the text.
   — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  13:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

  @SMcCandlish: I don't find this argument very convincing, largely a result of misinterpretted WP:CHERRYPICKING. Using just your links: several (LA timesNYP #1NYP #2VoxOK!) refer to the phrase "free the nipple" as a casual expression (often in quotes indicating a quote from the article subject, not a direct reference to the formal name of the wider movement), US doesn't even mention "free the nipple" in any form and so is irrelevant, and the ABAJ and NPR may back up your claim (more correctly a move to "free the nipple" or "free the nipple" movement), but the NPR reference links to a Time article, yet Time has also used Free the Nipple[19].
  Its odd that you choose to dismiss very mainstream reliable sources you found for Free the Nipple as "mistakenly" describing it "as a organization or group". Wikipedia works by WP:Verifiability and WP:STICKTOSOURCE, so at best your argument should be that the article should reflect this. Certainly, if there is a decided court case naming Free the Nipple as a party, then there is an identifiable group/organization with standing. As for the "capital-T" issue... its just more evidence in favor of capitalization, not something to be completely dismissed in seeking to lowercase. The sources already in use for this article overwhelmingly support a move to Free the Nipple.
  Lastly, I'll point out that the complete guideline at MOS:DOCTCAPS says "movements... are not capitalized, unless the name derives from a proper name" - this movement does directly derive from a proper name - that of Free the Nipple (film). I also ask @Dicklyon and Cinderella157: please re-evaluate. -- Netoholic @ 12:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

  The very fact that some of these sources are not self-consistent is itself an argument against WP capitalizing this, even more so that source A and source B not being consistent with each other. This article is about the general activism concept/cause, not about a specific incorporated organization (in Ft. Collins or anywhere else) with a proper name. That some of the sources also make this distinction when being careful (using "free the nipple" in general but "Free the Nipple" or in longer form "Free the Nipple–Ft. Collins" in reference to the organization that filed a lawsuit) is very noteworthy, and distinct from other sources just randomly capitalizing or not from article to article. Finally, some sources mistakenly referring to the general activism movement as an organization is demonstrably an error, and WP doesn't intentionally pass on errors (either directly or by implication) to our readers, no matter how often the same source is usually more reliable. "Follow the sources" is not a suicide pact, and we all understand that.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

  @SMcCandlish: Its not your place to decide WP:TRUTH, only to follow what these reliable sources say. And if they are identifying this as a named group, then so be it. At least we will address that by including all usages - that "Free the Nipple" is a movement, an organization, a hashtag, and a slogan. Why did you fail to respond to my MOS:DOCTCAPS point though? Clearly this movement/organization was named for the film, and we should be preserving that proper name in the title here because that is how the majority of sources refer to it. If you are going to push for using your prescriptive MOS guidelines to overrule WP:V, at least follow the damn things. -- Netoholic @ 09:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

• Lowercase per SMcCandlish's evidence and reasoning, so as not to confuse with the legal entity or the film. Neutral on whether to keep the disambiguator. Dicklyon (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
• Lowercase per SMcCandlish's evidence and reasoning. Sources don't support that this is "consistently" capitalised. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 09:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
• Downcased and disambiguated with parenthetical per SMcCandlish. Tony (talk) 00:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
• Lowercase per SMcCandlish's comments. Aoba47 (talk) 21:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.