Talk:Freida Pinto/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GleekVampire (talk · contribs) 11:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I will review this Good Article nomination. Nominators please be prepared to answer queries raised in the review. —GleekVampire | talk! 11:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

External links

• Let's start with some problematic External links as per the tool. There are redirects and dead links, please correct them first. —GleekVampire | talk! 11:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Fixed —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Early life and modeling career

• When she was ten, Sushmita Sen won Miss Universe 1994, which turned out to be a defining point in Pinto's life --> Please elaborate. How did Sen's win at Miss Universe become a defining point in her life? Are they related? Does Pinto consider her a role model?
  • She considered Sushmita Sen to be her role model and wanted to become like her. The fact is very well stated in the source. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Acting career

• Very well written :) No major issues here.
• Unlike her previous films, Trishna gained positive response from critics --> Can't find a reference for this
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Media image and personal life

• Soon after the release of Slumdog Millionaire, Pinto garnered immense popularity was frequently included among the "Most Beautiful Women in the World" list --> Shouldn't there be a conjunction or something between popularity and was?
  • Fixed —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
• The same year, Daily Telegraph reported that she was the highest paid Indian actress – she is not considered a Bollywood star as she never appeared in a Bollywood film --> Can you rephrase this sentence? It's a little confusing.
  • Rephrased —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Overall the article looks pretty good. —GleekVampire | talk! 13:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: