This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Was reading through this, and stumbled across this sentence in the "Background" section-paragraph:
Numerous proposals were submitted to the Technical Branch, but only two, prepared by P. Gille, a naval engineer overseeing the construction of the Normandie-class battleship Flandre, and then Lieutenant Durand-Viel, a student at the Naval College, respectively.
It feels like something is missing, as the "only two" does not appear to be properly explained... what is the context of these two being singled out? Only two, [prepared yadda respectively] were further evaluated? ...met the TB's criteria? Clarification appreciated. -- saberwyn11:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Good catch! Sometimes with those long sentences one can forget how the sentence started by the end of it ;) I've corrected it and split it in half to be a little more easily readable. Thanks! Parsecboy (talk) 12:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
