Talk:French battleship République
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the French battleship République article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | French battleship République has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
 | French battleship République is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Service history
editHold on, an article about a French battleship that served from 1906 to 1921 with no mention of World War I, not even an explanation as to why she didn't participate (assuming that's why no mention of it)? This is very hard to accept. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- What isn't in the sources isn't there. Apparently these two ships spent most of their time in port. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 14:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship République/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
edit- No issues
Lead
edit- No issues
Design
edit- No issues
Service history
edit- No issues
Footnotes
edit- No issues
References
edit- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that this article meets the good article criteria at this time. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)