Talk:French battleship Richelieu/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 21:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hey, mate long time no see ;) I will review this article as soon as possible. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Much appreciated - I didn't expect you to review this one for now and I forgot to check for the .0s before I nominated it, so I had to rush and fix them before you had a chance to catch me! Parsecboy (talk) 00:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Ha, funny. You got those first before me.

Lead

  • As war with Germany became Link Germany as in Nazi Germany.
    • Done
  • the Japanese in the Indian Ocean Link Indian Ocean here.
    • Done
  • Recalled to France in December 1945 Link France as in the "Provisional Government of the French Republic".
    • Hmm, that seems a little WP:EGGy to me - in the context, we're just talking about the place, so the link to the specific government doesn't seem appropriate there
  • Richelieu was part of the force that liberated Singapore following Link Singapore here as in the "British Military Administration (Malaya)".
    • I think this is the same situation as above - a reader clicking the link is going to expect to find the article on the city, not the specific government
  • Maybe, but, at ARC or FAC reviews you always to avoid linking current nations' links. So I assumed at that moment that we'd to link Singapore and France because they do not have the same nations as today. Anyway, I do not mind if France is unlinked but Singapore should be unlinked too because its link goes to the current nation's article. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • These included a number of bombardment Maybe replace "a number of" with "several".
    • Done
  • in Italy over the course of 1968–1969 Maybe replace "over the course of 1968–" to "from 1968 through"?
    • Works for me

More to come. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 05:46, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Take your time, it's a lengthy article. Parsecboy (talk) 12:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Body

  • When in 1934 Italy announced that Link Italy here as pipe link with the Kingdom of Italy.
    • Done
  • the French Navy immediately began preparations Link French Navy.
    • Done
  • within the 35,000 long tons (36,000 t) limit imposed First Link both "tonnes" here and it is 35,500 t not 36,000. Also why is long tons here the primary unit? I thought France you used metric ones at the time?
    • Yes, but for naval matters, long tons was specified as the international standard by the Washington and London treaties - the rest is fixed
  • with eight 380mm/45 Modèle (Mle) 1935 guns arranged We need a space between the unit and "380" here.
    • Good catch
  • nine 152 mm (6 in) /55 Mle 1930 guns mounted No link to the gun?
    • Added
  • Heavy anti-aircraft defense Link anti-aircraft defense and add (AA) behind aircraft.
    • Done
  • anti-aircraft v. antiaircraft.
    • Fixed
  • and Richelieu exceeded the 70,000 long tons (71,000 t) No primary metric units?
    • Same as above
  • unilaterally signed with Germany in June 1935 Link Germany as in Nazi Germany again.
    • Done
  • Repair work was conducted in Brest from Link Brest here.
    • Done
  • No metric horsepower?
    • I just follow the source, and Jordan & Dumas gave the figures in shaft horsepower
  • the war against Germany. In addition Maybe remove In addition with besides.
    • Hmm, I don't like "besides" there. How about "also" instead?

More to come. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • In the "British attack on 8 July 1940 and repairs" section, the section uses both short and long tons even the rest of the article doesn't use short ones.
    • Fixed
  • island of Gorée, pointed south, so Remove the second comma.
    • Done
  • the British sent a motor boat from merge "motor" and "boat" together.
    • Done
  • After disengaging for the day, de Gaulle decided to abandon Remove the second space between "Gaulle" and "decided".
    • Good catch
  • attack, codenamed Operation Menace Link Operation Menace.
    • That's just a redirect to Battle of Dakar, and since I have the main link at the top of the section, I didn't think it needs to be repeated
  • the men and supplies, continued on south to Gabon Remove the Gabon's link and add before Gabon "present-day".
    • See if what I've changed it to works for you
  • would be transferred to metropolitan France for repairs Link metropolitan France here and capitalise metropolitan.
    • I don't think "metropolitan" is a proper noun when used in the phrase - see the article, which doesn't capitalize it in running text.
  • It's really odd to see an empty section called "Free-French career: 1943–1945".
    • It's just a section header to group all of the lower headers in the same section - the same as the "World War II" header
  • the Germans in invade the rest Remove "in" here.
    • Fixed
  • In addition, repairing and modernizing a ship Remove "In addition" and replace it with besides.
    • "Besides" doesn't really work there - what's your objection to "in addition? :P
  • The ships arrived on 11 February and on the 18th Remove the second "on" here.
    • No, that's needed there
  • the shell and propellant lifts being rebuilt Is this the verb lifts or the plural of the noun?
    • Plural of the noun
  • where ordereda contract to Remove the extra space between "where" and "ordereda" here.
    • I'm not seeing this one
  • to produce 930 shells was from You mean were?
    • The contract was ordered, not the shells
  • After more than two and a half years without I'm not sure or we should use "two and a half years"? Is this allowed? I mean MOS says we shouldn't use numbers with more than two words above nine. But are comma numbers also included?
    • Yeah, I wouldn't say "2.5 years" or "2 1/2 years"
  • Richelieu's tower fore mast was heavily Merge "fore mast" here.
    • Done
  • the hull was in need of maintenance Replace "was in need of" with needed.
    • Done
  • The ship stopped in the Azores Add Portugal here.
    • Done
  • a single freighter of 3,000 t (3,000 long tons) Remove long tons here there is already one previously.
    • good catch
  • On entering the Indian Ocean Link Indian Ocean here.
    • Done
  • The four ships arrived in Trincomalee, Ceylon on 10 April Pipe Ceylon's link as in British Ceylon.
    • Done
  • Supreme Allied Commander of the South-East Asia Theater American "Theater" we should use theatre because it's part of the name.
    • Good point
  • while the Dutch cruiser HNMS Tromp led a the HNMS Tromp's link is an SIA.
    • Fixed
  • her boilers were in need of a re-tubing Remove "were in need of" with "required".
    • Done
  • in Casablana, Mers-el-Kébir, and Dakar Typo of Casablanca.
    • Fixed
  • to September to conduct a survey of the work Remove "conduct" "a" and "of".
    • Done
  • of Vice Amiral (Vice Admiral) Jaujard Is there a link to the Jaujard's article. Also what/who wat it?
    • First name is apparently Robert, but no article on him - a redlink will have to do for now
  • Post-war v. postwar.
    • Fixed
  • supplemented with fifty 20 mm (0.79 in) Oerlikon guns they're cannon not guns.
    • Fixed
  • when she was laid up in Brest Why is laid up linked to Wiktionary?
    • That's a fairly common link to use

I'll do the image, infobox and the sources tomorrow. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

  • No link for the "100 mm (3.9-inch) anti-aircraft guns"?
  • Link both normal and full load.
    • Those are linked in the box above
  • Link of these "380 mm/45 guns", "152 mm/50 guns" and "100 mm anti-aircraft guns" guns?
    • They're already linked in the box above
  • Replace "20 mm (0.79 in) Oerlikon AA guns" with with "20 mm (0.79 in) Oerlikon AA cannons"
    • Done

Sources

  • Maybe a code like ISBN, ISSN or OCLC in Dumas' book?
    • Added an OCLC
  • Google books say to me that the publisher of Rohwer's book is "Naval Institute Press" and not "Chatham Publishing".
  • Maybe standardise the hyphens in ISBNs.
    • Done

Images

  • Is it normal to not see a chunk of the The_Royal_Navy_during_the_Second_World_War_A23483.jpg image?
    • Yeah, there was something wrong with the scan - see the source page
  • The is no summary table in the File:Richelieu-1.jpg and there should be a link there too. Same with File:Richelieu-3.jpg
    • Neither are necessary for the image to be usable - Rama uploaded a bunch of scans from the ONI books, and the only reason the one has a link was because I uploaded a higher-res version the NHHC has digitized - for whatever reason they haven't done the others.
  • What's the date of File:Richelieu Ney York.jpg and where is its link too?
    • Added the year, and the link is already there

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:43, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply