Talk:French cruiser Amiral Aube
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
 | French cruiser Amiral Aube has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 16, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Amiral Aube/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
edit1. Prose 
On hold
2. Verifiability On hold
3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous On hold
Comments
edit1.
- "was a one of five Gloire-class armored cruisers " - I don't think "a" is necessary
- " two singe-gun wing turrets" - I'm not particularly familiar with naval warfare, so I can't tell if "singe-gun" is a term I'm not familiar or a typo for "single"
- Maybe I'm just missing something, but I'm struggling to find where the 174mm armor thickness for the barbettes is reflected in the prose
- Infobox says it was laid down on 9 August 1899, prose says February 1901. The 1899 date appears to be the order date.
- Infobox gives completion date of 17 April 1904, prose gives 1 April 1904
- No need to link Canada per MOS:OVERLINK
- "and she had required frequent repairs until she was sent to Brest for a refit in March 1916." - Not sure that "had" is necessary
- Link Brest in the prose, most North American readers don't have a great grasp of French geography
2.
- Generally Wordpress isn't a great source, but since it just seems to be hosting a primary source report, it's accessable, since the report is reliable and I'm assuming good faith that the Canada At War Blog properly posted the contents of the report. If a better hosting of the content is available, I'd recommend using that before taking this article to ACR or FAC.
- I'm not seeing where the "French Cruiser Sully" from the references is cited at all. If it's not used, move to further reading.
- The EL redirects to a home page, repair or remove.
- Is there an OCLC, ISBN, or ISSN available for Kennan?
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
- Add a short description
That's it, placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- This just goes to show the value of a second pair of eyes. Many thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)