Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 19:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Prose

2. Verifiability

3. Depth of Coverage

4. Neutral

5. Stable

6. Illustrations

7. Miscellaneous

Comments

1.

• Rochefort is a duplink
  • Good catch, sometimes I forget to go back through and check for those.

2.

3.

• I'm going to go ahead and assumed that while the namesake can probably be easily inferred, no source states it directly.
  • Yes, unfortunately.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Honestly, that's it. To me at least, it clearly meets the GA requirements, so I'm going to do something I've never done before and just quick-pass this one. Very good work, I really hope I didn't miss something. Hog Farm (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)