Talk:French cruiser Coëtlogon

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Coëtlogon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Claim. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Body and lead

• Can we expand the lead just a little bit like where she did her trails and operating?
  • I don't know where she did her trials
• the earlier unprotected cruiser Milan I'd think we better can add French here because I believe some people can be confused to Milan and think she was an Italian ship (because Milan is in Italy)?
  • Is that really necessary? We're talking about French cruisers, isn't the context clear?
• The unprotected cruiser Milan was Same as above.
• Link ardent supporter.
  • To what?

• Is there no link or so?

• To "ardent supporter"? No, that doesn't have any specific meaning beyond what the words themselves mean

• No link for some of the guns?
  • We don't have an article for them
• which was kept in commission for only four months per year If this commission lasted only four months a year what happened with her in the rest of the year?
  • They were decommissioned, but I don't know when they entered and left service
• By January 1901, Coëtlogon and both of her sister ships --> "By January 1901, she and both of her sister ships"
  • Done
• about 2,000 long tons (2,032 t) displacement Normal or full load same in the infobox.
  • Conway's doesn't say, unfortunately

Infobox

• The tons don't match with the body.
  • Yeah they do - you're looking at the wrong number in the body - check the second paragraph

Images

• "File:Forbin-Poyet.jpg" is there a tag which states it's in the public domain over the whole world?
  • I'm not sure what you're asking; almost all countries use some form of year PMA to determine copyright, so all of them that are 100 years or less are fine per the template. But I've added a US tag as well
• Also just a question here is, do the NHHC's tags only speak for the US's domain?
  • Yes

Sources

• Barry's OCLC doesn't say Washington D.C. but only Washington however this can be confused with the state Washington. Do you know a source or so which states it's made in D.C.? Same with Dorn, E. J. & Drake, J. C.
  • If you look at the source itself, yes, it says D.C.
• Both Brassey's 1895s should have their letters like the citations say.
  • Done
• All Brasseys have the same OCLC?
  • Yes, since it's a periodical
• Gardiner's link uses the location: New York instead of London?
  • London is correct for the first edition that I'm using - this is the entry you're looking for
• Are months really needed here? Except maybe both Brassey's 1895s should have a month or a letter to separate them.
  • Yes, those are monthly periodicals so the month is required. Brassey's was an annual; there's no month

That's it from me I think. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@CPA-5: - anything left to address? Parsecboy (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

• Hey Nate sorry for letting you wait for some time. I lost the ambition of Wikipedia and hadn't really time to reply (I had just started again with work and school —exams are coming too–. After a quick review, I think we should add years if possible in the image "File:French_cruiser_Coëtlogon_NH_66063.jpg" before I could pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

• @CPA-5: - no problem, things do come up. I don't have any years to add to the photos, unfortunately - I could say "date unknown", but I don't know if that really adds any information of value. Parsecboy (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

• A pretty small article but it does meet the GA requirements; there is no reason to hold it back. Nice work as always. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 06:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)