Talk:French destroyer Épée (1938)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review
 | French destroyer Épée (1938) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 15, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Épée (1938)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- only days before the French signed an armistice with the Germans Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
- to counter the large destroyers of the Italian Navigatori and Japanese Fubuki classes Pipe Italian and Japanese with the Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan.
- steam provided by four Sural-Penhöet forced-circulation boilers Link Sural-Penhöet.
- Their anti-aircraft armament consisted Add "(AA)".
- In addition a pair of single mounts for Browning 13.2-millimeter Replace "In addition" with "besides".
- No, that doesn't work.
- No edit wars.
Infobox
- Looks okay to me.
Images
- Is there a link to the source of File:Hardi-2.jpg?
- Added.
Sources
- "French Destroyers: Torpilleurs d'Escadre and Contre-Torpilleurs,1922-1956" needs a Google Books URL.
- No it doesn't. And there's a bot running around that does it anyway
- Google Books claims that the title of Whitley is "Destroyers of World War Two: An International Encyclopedia" Could you confirm whether it is right or not?
- Wait for a second. There are two "Destroyers of World War Two" both from Whitley?
- Nah, just an incomplete copy-paste job from another article.
That's it I think. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- See if my changes are acceptable.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- No OR.
- Yes they're acceptable sorry Sturm for annoying you with the Google Books URL. But because I couldn't find anything else in this nomination and MOS says it should be included then I thought every byte is necessary especially in a small article like this because I want that sweet 30 GANs barnstar. And thank you for nominating every day at least a GAN. Because most GANs are already claimed by someone else due to the drive which is really annoying as hell. I think I will let it pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)