Talk:French destroyer Casque (1938)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review
French destroyer Casque (1938) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 20, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Casque (1938)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 20:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- only days before the French signed an armistice with the Germans Pipe Germans with Nazi Germany.
- damaged her propeller while getting under way Merge "under ways".
- the twin Hotchkiss machine guns were repositioned Is there a link for Hotchkiss?
- Is there a link for "10th DT"?
- No.
- Standardise the usage of "machine-gun" both in the body and the infobox.
Infobox
- Shouldn't the "Namesake" be in the body too?
- No, it's just a translation.
Images
- Looks good to me.
Sources
- Looks good to me ether.
You've copy-pasted my last review's comments to this one right? :) Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- I think that the term is incorporated them into this article. I told you that it would be a checklist for the rest of this class' articles ;-) Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Aren't we done here?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry yes we are Sturm. I was just a little bit busy with the 2019 Belgian F-16 crash article. It took me a whole day to make and find the sources for an article like this and now I believe it is B-class. I do not have anything else to say so I think I will let it pass. PS the rest of GANs will follow. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Aren't we done here?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)