Talk:French destroyer Kersaint (1931)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 22:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

On my list. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

• Is the range or the shell weight of the main armament known?
  • Sure, but I save those sorts of details for the class article which gets all the technical details.
• "although these were older models than the one previously installed" Either "older models" → 'an older model'; or "one" → 'ones'.
• "lest the ships be turned over" "lest"? You've been reading my articles. Optional, suggest 'to prevent the ships being ... '
  • Is that a terribly old-fashioned term? I like it because it's economical, and, you know, every additional keystroke is something to be avoided if I'm to maintain my current level of output. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Well up to your usual standards. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed