Talk:French ironclad Bouvines

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Bouvines/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Prose  On hold

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

Comments

1.

• Is there a specific reason that the convention of having the subject of article in bold in the first sentence isn't done here?
  • 'Cause I'm an idiot?
• "The crew of the Bouvines class numbered 18 officers and 318 ratings; service as a flagship added 5 more officers and 33 more ratings.[2]" - This suggests 336 and 374, the infobox states 333 and 371
  • Typo, fixed to 15 officers
• "The Bouvines class had a full-length waterline armor belt of steel that tapered from the maximum thickness of 464 mm (18.3 in) amidships to 250 mm (9.8 in) at the ship's ends." - Infobox gives 434 for the top number.
• "others, including Rear Admiral Chateauminois" - Is his full name known?
• "briefly became the flagship of Rear Admiral Ménard" - Is full name known?
• " was replaced by Rear Admiral Escande" - Ditto as above
  • I've been unable to find their first names. None of them are listed in my biographical dictionary of French admirals.

2.

• Referencing looks good.

3.

4.

5.

6.

• Licensing looks good.

7.

Placing on hold, just a few things to tighten up.

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)