Talk:French ironclad Marceau/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 12:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Copyvio Detector reports no problems with the article (no action required)
- Dablinks could not (for some reason) analyze the article to detect duplicate links at this time. I'll go through the links manually as I go through the prose (no action required at this time)
- Checklinks reports all external links are in order (no action required)
- The article contains two duplicate links which should be removed per WP:OVERLINK. Those are: Barbette and Sea trial
- The two photos require US-PD licence in addition to EU-PD one in place
- The sketch is properly licensed and captions of all the images are in order (no action required)
- Prose referencing appears to be completely fine (no action required)
- The prose specifies top speed of 16.194 kts while the infobox specifies 16 kts. I realise that the three-decimal-place precision might not be needed in the box, but perhaps it would be better off rounded to 16.2 kts instead.
- Were the two M1884 guns comprising the main battery also 340mm L28 guns as the M1881s, or not? I'm confused because the present wording leads me to conclude that they were, only to see there was a 16-gun secondary battery consisting of 138.6mm M1884 QF guns. Were the M1884s in the main battery different from the M1884s in the secondary battery, or could this be a typo or something?
- According to MOS:YEAR, year ranges such as 1886–1887 should be presented as 1886–87.
Overall, nice article, with only a few things needing attention.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:21, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:15, 10 October 2013 (UTC)