Talk:French ironclad Valeureuse
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Zawed in topic GA Review
French ironclad Valeureuse has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 27, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Valeureuse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 07:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I will take a look at this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 07:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- I'm really struggling to nitpick this. My comments are:
- In the lead, ...and a Prussian commerce raider in a neutral Spanish port. Suggest adding later after the "and" in this quote. Otherwise the reader gets the impression the blockade of the North Sea and the Spanish port is happening at the same time.
- In the construction and service section, the laid down date doesn't match the infobox
- ...premature detonation blew the breech off a 24 cm gun.... That measurement should be expressed in mm for consistency with the rest of the article.
- In the text, the date she was stricken doesn't match the infobox. Also, is condemned the same as stricken?
- I'm not sure. Sometimes they seem to be, but other times I have different dates for stricken and condemned in different sources.
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- The edits look good and I am satisfied the article meets the GA criteria. Passing now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 07:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)