Talk:French ship Droits de l'Homme (1794)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the French ship Droits de l'Homme (1794) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ship's complement
editOne item springs to mind, were there really only 3 officers? The usual number for a British ship of the same size would be about 6 or 7 commissioned officers plus a number of senior warrant officers, the officers of Marines, plus petty officers etc. I know France is egalitarian but who stands the watches? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabbler (talk • contribs) 15:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- It sounds to me like 3 is the number of officers ranking "capitaine". I seem to recall that you'd have a capitaine de vaisseau in command, a capitaine de frégate for first officer and a capitaine de corvette or frégate as second officer, plus the complement of lieutenants and ensigns that you can imagine. I'll try to find sources on this. Rama 15:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Number dying in the wreck
editIs the number 250-390 quoted meant to include all the sailors and soldiers who died in the wreck or just the official naval crew members with an additional number of army soldiers also dying. Most sources I see quote a total death toll of 900-1000 men. Dabbler (talk) 04:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Armament
editIn the table, the gun "calibers" are obviously converted from pounds to kg using the Avoirdupois pound. I doubt that the french used this imperial measure - can somebody check? --84.177.121.2 (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on French ship Droits de l'Homme (1794). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130323150546/http://dossiersmarine.free.fr/fs_v_V4.html to http://dossiersmarine.free.fr/fs_v_V4.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)