Talk:Fresh

Latest comment: 9 years ago by EdJohnston in topic Requested move 25 April 2015

Comments

edit

Who is Rami Dunham? That person doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia article, so is it really important to have it in the first line of the article? --84.28.149.182 (talk) 11:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Semi-Protection

edit

I added semi-protection due to the repetitious vandalism carried out by certain IP addresses. Going back through the article's history, it seems to attract a lot of it. --UnneededAplomb (talk) 07:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 April 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. This appears to be intended as a move of Draft:Fresh, which is not yet ready for main space. If the draft did get promoted it would need a suitable disambiguator. The name Fresh (rapper) is available when needed. EdJohnston (talk) 00:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


FreshUnofficial Fresh – Another Page has the same name – CDanes23 (talk) 02:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). CDanes23 (talk) 04:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

The reason that unofficial fresh was suggested as the new page name is because the artist's other stage name as well as their website is called "Unofficial Fresh". Currently, the page says Draft:Fresh. Changing the name to Unofficial Fresh will allow the page to be easily identified separate from other fresh pages.

CDanes23, Fresh is a navigation page with substantial content. It is impossible within Wikipedia's methodology for two pages to have the same name. GregKaye 07:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Regardless of wheter or not Cleniq Clarissa Danes is notable I can't possibly see how he would be the primary meaning of the term fresh.--67.68.161.47 (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Strong oppose ofcourse there are other pages with this name, this is a disambiguation page, it lists pages that have this name. Further the suggested title makes absolutely no sense, as there is nothing "unofficial fresh" associated with it. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2015 (UTC) restored from RMTR objection -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.