Talk:Fresh Horses (album)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 17 October 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved Fresh Horses → Fresh Horses (film). Fresh Horses (album) will not be moved and a disambiguation will be created at Fresh Horses. -- Tavix (talk) 04:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
– The Garth Brooks album has more pageviews in recent history (well over 100 a day, vs. ~80 for the film). Furthermore, the album has a much larger number of inbound links, and at least five of the ~50 inbound links intended for the album actually link to the film's page, so I would bet that many of the hits for the Film's page are actually for people looking for the album. Whatever the case, I think it's pretty clear-cut that a multi-platinum album by one of the biggest singers of all time is far more WP:PRIMARYTOPIC than some obscure film. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose 100/80 is not really a significant absolute majority topic with only two candidates. The Andrew McCarthy and Molly Ringwald film seems to meet the 2nd half of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC more than the album, and will be more familiar to a broader audience than country music even if the article is hit slightly less. Plus flipping them over will break links off Wikipedia. Would Support (film) if the base becomes an easy click dab page with Fresh Horses, album by Jim Byrnes (actor) and a "see also" to The Bottle & Fresh Horses album by alternative rock band The Refreshments. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support. The film got poor reviews and was a commercial flop, and does not meet the second criteria of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, while the album, which went 7x platinum and peaked at #2 on the Billboard 2000, does. I also strongly suspect that the film would not be getting the pageviews it does were it not at the main title. I find the arguments in favor of the Brooks album occupying it much more plausible. Nohomersryan (talk) 13:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support second and oppose first, no primary 2601:541:4305:C70:E15E:6967:4541:8423 (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support as proposed, per Nohomersryan. SSTflyer 09:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support second and oppose first, no primary. Andrewa (talk) 02:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I am fine with neither subject being the primary topic. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:10, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fresh Horses (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721000000/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-accreditations.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-accreditations.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150315204844/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5aWxoHiRP?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.riaa.com%2Fgoldandplatinumdata.php%3Ftable%3DSEARCH_RESULTS to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fresh Horses (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AsiN9wPQ?url=http://www.musiccanada.com/GoldPlatinum.aspx to http://www.cria.ca/cert_db_search.php?page=4&wclause=WHERE+artist_name+like+%27%25Garth+brooks%25%27+ORDER+BY+cert_date%2C+cert_award+&rcnt=75&csearch=20&nextprev=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)