Talk:Friedrich Albert Lange
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWeblink (German Language): http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Lange,+Friedrich+Albert F.Schmidt17May2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.150.218.146 (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
TYPO: "He no longer played a role in the unification of the Lassalleans with Bebel's socialists into the unified SPD in May 1975(????)." Euh...I'm guessing this is 1875... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.49.231.102 (talk) 16:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Delete the 'Literature' section
edit- First, I am not a fan of long lists of secondary literature on Wikipedia. An encyclopedia article is not a research paper or monograph so I fail to see how swamping an article with books that are not available to most readers is helpful. My rule for secondary literature would be: if you can't link to the book or if it's not in <.ref.> brackets then don't waste our time with it.
- Second, all of the secondary literature in this section (minus one book) is in German. Language aside, good luck in finding Duisburger Forschungen in North America. Not helpful.
- Third, this is just a cut & paste job purloined from the German Wikipedia (see here). What is helpful to German Wikipedia users is not necessarily helpful to English Wikipedia users (see above). How many visitors to this article would know (Bd.) is the German abbreviation for 'volume' and (S.) for 'page'? Not helpful.
- Jimaingram 06:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. It just adds to the clutter. It is available in the German Wikipedia article if someone is interested. This sort of detail makes sense in the "home language" version of the article. If it were a biography about an English speaker, then I think it would be more acceptable. Relevant books in English would certainly be worth mentioning, even if a link can't be found for them. A "Bibliography" of English-language books seems acceptable to me. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: History of Science to Newton
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 11 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JaydenSprigg (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by JaydenSprigg (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)