Hi Barbara, I find it interesting how each one of our organization outlines look so different - they are beautifully tailored to each organization and its bylaws. The one section that I has a question about was "Acquisitions." Does FUG actively acquired objects? If you are giving information about the Uffizi's acquisitions, I would say that this may not be necessary to include in this page. Also, while I appreciate the different sections under the Overview section because they create these little pockets of information, I think there may be too many? The mission, strategy and goals could be one, and the history could be grouped with the first paragraph under the Overview section. These, of course, are just suggestions. I also noticed under the History section that you say "important" several times - important restoration projects, important paintings…this may not be an unbiased POV. Saying they are important can be subjective, based on one's opinion of what an important painting or project is. Other than that, the charts are GREAT! I love that they put the information into an easy-to-read format. I may also look to include other references for Wikipedia standards, although I'm sure it's hard to find things outside the organizational documents you've included. Great job so far! Areppertgerber (talk) 23:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
