Talk:Frimley

Untitled

maybe this page could do with some Links to relevant articles, like local things to Frimley

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Frimley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927090247/http://www.madmusingsof.me.uk/archives/google.php to http://www.madmusingsof.me.uk/archives/google.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Frimley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030192829/http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm to http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mdx.ac.uk/WWW/STUDY/4Asylums.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frimley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060503063610/http://www.dumaurier.org/reviews-jamaica.html to http://www.dumaurier.org/reviews-jamaica.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Frimley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060423052619/http://www.surreyheath.gov.uk/tourism/AboutSurreyHeath/heritage.htm to http://www.surreyheath.gov.uk/tourism/AboutSurreyHeath/heritage.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050929063554/http://www.sussexacf.demon.co.uk/history.htm to http://www.sussexacf.demon.co.uk/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Town/village discussion

FAO @TheSmashingBlumpkins, @Simon Burchell, @2a02:c7c:d01a:de00:9590:557d:65b5:1e71, @2A02:C7C:D01A:DE00:A488:5DF0:7873:A21B

There have been a number of edits and reversions of this article's lead recently, changing the description of Frimley between being a "town" and a "village". It seems that there are sources that support both views, and as these are slightly fuzzily-defined categories there may never be a definitive single correct answer.

Can I suggest we attempt to reach a consensus of how to handle this before any further edits?

I propose adding the following to the article's History section, or elsewhere if you've a better suggestion:

Frimley is an electoral ward of the Borough of Surrey Heath. It is sometimes referred to as a town, and sometimes as a village.

This would enable a lead (with citations in the body as suggested by MOS:LEADCITE) that says the following:

Frimley is a settlement and electoral ward in the Borough of Surrey Heath in Surrey, England, approximately 30 mi (48 km) southwest of central London.

Your views welcome.

Jonathan Deamer (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

• Scanning through the article history, the very first incarnation in 2005 said "small town/village", but this was quickly changed to town.[1] This looks to have been stable until this edit in June 2022, with a edit summary AFAICS not backed up by a source,[2] and which was subsequently reverted. Town remained until a few weeks ago then was changed to village [3] by the same editor who made the June 2022 change. Recently, to and fro reversions with sources. Notifying @DragonofBatley who is also involved. To summarise, we have one editor insisting it's a village against 3 or 4 editors saying it's a town. We have an article that's existed for 18 years and for all that time bar short-lived changes, Frimley in its current state has been described as a town.

On to sources. However Frimley is described, sources should be the deciding factor and different weightings apply. Sources 3 and 4 are local whereas sources 2 and 3 are national. Source 1 verifies the ward. Surrey County Council use town [4], a more up-to-date source than the 2002 road order. The ONS categorises Frimley as a small town based on population.[5] and the Ordnance Survey categorises Frimley as a town.[6]

Recommendation. Unless stronger sources are put up to support the "village" case, the weight of evidence appears to favour Frimley as a small town so that is what the lead and other instances throughout the article should state. Village seems to be a local view best reflected in a note and confined to mentions in the History section. (Wendover is an example.) Rupples (talk) 04:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Very quickly, before I head out for the evening: the newly published Surrey Pevsner (Buildings of England) says: "Fifty years ago a small old village on the Hampshire border but now a small and architecturally unremarkable town." (p.346) Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 17:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)