Talk:Fritchley Tunnel
 | A fact from Fritchley Tunnel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Derbyshire may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
grade rating
editNote: two sources appear to clash on the grade rating, if any, of this bridge: the Derby Telegraph says this is Grade II listed: the English Heritage register entry says no grade level applies to this case. I've gone with the Derby Telegraph because it's a secondary source, per standard procedure. But which is right? -- The Anome (talk) 10:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for creating this, I was about to. I've seen grade II listed mentioned in the press too, but according to [1], as well as the source in the article, it is actually a scheduled monument. It might well be both, with the press coverage relating to the more recent listing. Nice to get this to DYK, if it could be expanded to meet the minimum size. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've nominated it at DYK: Template:Did you know nominations/Fritchley Tunnel. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've also recategorized the article to reflect its status as a scheduled ancient monument, instead of a listed building. -- The Anome (talk) 12:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've nominated it at DYK: Template:Did you know nominations/Fritchley Tunnel. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fritchley Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141216221013/http://butterleygangroadproject.com/ to http://butterleygangroadproject.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)