Talk:Frome Hoard
 | A fact from Frome Hoard appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Broken Reference Links
editSome time after the page was created the Portable Antiquities Scheme changed their website and many of the reference links pointing to blog entries about the find are now broken.
It looks like the final form of the blog was archived on the 13th of January 2013.
The Frome HoardGraham1973 (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
What else is needed for a GA nomination?
editNow that this article is stable and no new information seems forthcoming, what else do people think would be needed before considering it for GA nomination?— Rod talk 10:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Frome Hoard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/katie-the-phonecall/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/anna-day-one/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/katie-day-one/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/katie-–-day-two/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/anna-–-day-two/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/katie-day-three/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/anna-day-three/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/geophys/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/metal-detectorist-finds-largest-pot-of-roman-coins-from-britain/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122070138/http://finds.org.uk/news/stories/article/id/196 to http://www.finds.org.uk/news/stories/article/id/196
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/frome-coins-on-display-and-a-gallery-talk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- The archive link seems to work. But none of the finds.org.uk/blogs links? With the aid of the archive link, all refs in the article seem to work. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)