Talk:Frontal assault

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Can someone verify the 48% casualty fact that was in here before? Did 48% of all American combat casualties actually occur in the Civil War? -Prometheus

Good call. I added it because it was in the original stub, but it doesn't look true according to some websites.

--cprompt

Oh, wait. Actually, it's 4.8%. That's still a lot, but I don't think it is so significant it needs to be in the article. I have no objections if anyone else adds it, feeling otherwise. Source: http://www.geobop.com/World/NA/Topics/History/Civil_War/reference/compare/

--cprompt

(An old discussion, I know.) 48% was wrong, but not that far off. Checking against the numbers at Remember.gov and our own United States casualties of war, both reveal 34%. If you use the KIAs (instead of the "total deaths"), its more like 28%. Only World War II was worse in terms of American casualties. --Mrwojo 02:15, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Tactical vs Operational Levels

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Right now there is no distinction made in the article. Centurion216 (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic