Talk:Frustration of purpose
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Danculley in topic Complete Revision
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Complete Revision
editThis article, like so many litigants, previously confused frustration of purpose with the related doctrines of impossibility/impracticably (depending on what legal tradition one comes from). A quick look at Chapter 11 of the Second Restatement (§§ 261-272) should clear up any misconceptions. Danculley 03:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Once again our American friends seem to think the common law belongs to them, IT DOESN'T!!! if you're going to write only about America then at least mention the fact that you are doing so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jd123 (talk • contribs) 16:57, August 24, 2007 (UTC)