Talk:Fudanjuku

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 21 October 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 02:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nakano Fujo Sisters → Fudanjuku – Group started out as Nakano Fujo Sisters, with Fudanjuku as an alter-ego group, but all major charting musical releases have been under the name "Fudanjuku" while the Nakano Fujo Sisters name is no longer active. Oricon profile also lists name as Fudanjuku. lullabying (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 22:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC) .Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Lullabying: Best discuss this one. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic